This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: CVS versus subversion
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:40:26AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:58:46 +0200, Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:12:30AM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> >> We can't rename the source directory. Under CVS, there is no "rename"
> >> of directories; we'd have to recreate libstdc++ and then move the files.
> >> Another CVSism is that directories don't ever die, they just become empty.
> >
> > So, isn't this the perfect opportunity to move away
> > from CVS and start using subversion?
When the switch is eventually made, I (or my grandchildren) will recommend
a rename at the time the code is imported.
> I'd rather not switch until annotate is implemented.
At least annotate, and maybe a couple of other things, too.
Phil
--
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
- Brian W. Kernighan