This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Something about std::list<> member functions.

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Dhruv Matani <dhruvbird at gmx dot net>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 09 Aug 2003 20:55:16 +0200
Subject: Re: Something about std::list<> member functions.
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <1060419109.2485.3.camel@home.free> <3F351D1F.4080205@free.fr><m3vft6228y.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><1060451478.4410.6.camel@home.free>

Dhruv Matani <dhruvbird@gmx.net> writes:

[...]

| form At&T syntax, but I thought (and still do think) that compiler
| technology should have evolved by now so as to optimize such stuff into
| nothingness...... And, looking at g++ optimizations, I definitely
| thought that it could (at least now) optimize away the layer.

See recent discussions on gcc@gcc.gnu.org about inlining.

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Something about std::list<> member functions.
  - From: Nathan Myers

References:
- Something about std::list<> member functions.
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: Something about std::list<> member functions.
  - From: Gawain Bolton
- Re: Something about std::list<> member functions.
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Something about std::list<> member functions.
  - From: Dhruv Matani

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]