This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Updated patch for std::list: Performance and memory usage improvements.
Gawain Bolton <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
| >Thanks, those pieces of information worth mentioning when sending the
| >patch -- the patch looks like more uglication and one might wonder
| >whether the obfuscation buys us anything.
| Uglification? Obfuscation? You must be referring to the
| std::list::swap() function. I agre that it is not very pretty, but
| there is no question it buys us something. I'm sure you'll agree that
| using less CPU time as well as less memory is a good thing.
Look, I'm all for efficiency. I'm not for obfuscation. I'm not for
pifometric performance improvement. I can trade clarity for efficiency
when sufficient evidences are given. Something that was missing from
your original posting, hence my remark.