This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [libstdc++] Port-specific symbol exports, porting notes
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 18:29:23 -0400
- Subject: Re: [libstdc++] Port-specific symbol exports, porting notes
On Sunday, Jul 6, 2003, at 18:08 US/Eastern, Phil Edwards wrote:
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 11:12:06PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Phil Edwards wrote:
So I submit that nearly all the folks mixing development-stage
with older released binutils will be us.
...and thousands of users of the BSD ports collections, and many users
who need to use non-released GCC for various reasons, and so on.
If we can work with vendor tools (as, ld) we really should also
older versions of the GNU tools.
I have no problem doing this, that's why I asked for suggestions. The
bug that Andrew pointed out may influence this.
It is not a ld bug but an as bug, not that should not matter because
they usually come together.