This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Allow setbuf(_s, 1)

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:44:16 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch] Allow setbuf(_s, 1)
References: <3EEF64E2.1010206@unitus.it> <3EEF7A57.7060300@unitus.it> <20030618114152.1a1c58e2.bkoz@redhat.com> <3EF098AF.3060605@unitus.it> <20030618132455.2fe036c2.bkoz@redhat.com> <3EF0B04A.80407@unitus.it>

Paolo Carlini wrote:

Yep... and stringbuf/setbuf also misses that '> 0'. Will do later today.

Actually (do you agree?) stringbuf/setbuf misses '>= 0'.

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch] Allow setbuf(_s, 1)
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

References:
- [Patch] Allow setbuf(_s, 1)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] Allow setbuf(_s, 1)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] Allow setbuf(_s, 1)
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [Patch] Allow setbuf(_s, 1)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] Allow setbuf(_s, 1)
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [Patch] Allow setbuf(_s, 1)
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]