This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Nathan's improvements to basic_string

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:02:24 -0500
Subject: Re: [Patch] Nathan's improvements to basic_string
References: <3EE8CDF1.6070103@unitus.it><200306132250.h5DMo60b027454@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>

>That's because the asm constraints [in config/cpu/i486/atomicity.h]
>are now likely wrong.  They likely became wrong when someone installed
>the patch to allow either {0,1} or {1,0} ordering...

That would be:

2003-06-02  Andrew Pinski  <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>

	PR libstdc++/9815
	* config/cpu/i386/atomicity.h (__exchange_and_add): add intel
	asm case to asm.
	* config/cpu/i486/atomicity.h (__exchange_and_add): Likewise.
	(__atomic_add): likewise.

I checked this in, after the x86 maintainer (RTH) approved. If it's not
right, they'd be the best people to contact about fixing it.

-benjamin

References:
- [Patch] Nathan's improvements to basic_string
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] Nathan's improvements to basic_string
  - From: Loren James Rittle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]