Re: ext/mt_alloc.h

[Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>]

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 07:02:46PM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote:
> In article <20030521183008.2089e4bc.bkoz@redhat.com>,
> Benjamin Kosnik<bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > I'm still in favor of moving extra things out of namespace std in
> > stl_alloc.h and into ext. Does anybody have strong feelings about this?
> 
> No.  It does seem that anything not in the standard should be outside
> namespace std and/or named using our implementor space (i.e. leading
> underscores, etc).  Also, it does seem that almost everything we
> advertise to users should not be named in our implementor space.

Yeah, we should split __gnu_cxx into two.


I'm thinking of just mailing the "90% done" patch for the allocator rewrite
to Stefan, since he's making progress far faster than me.  :-)

Phil

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams