This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: What's wrong with <limits>?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 04:08:36PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com> writes:
> |
> | I'm trying to update 17_intro/CHECKLIST, which hasn't been touched in four
> | years. If there's something you /know/ that isn't conforming about limits,
> | then the comment makes sense. If you think it's conforming, let's remove it.
>
> Then, I didn't make an in-depth auditing to make sure we have a
> conforming implementation now. I would say, leave it alone.
That sounds like there still needs to be a change in numeric_limits'
entry in CHECKLIST, then, given the possible status codes. Could you
take a brief look at the top of CHECKLIST? Right now limits is an 'X'.
Your description above sounds more like a 'T'.
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams