This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: zero-alloc cache (was Re: [v3] Fix PR libstdc++/10276)

From: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz at nabi dot net>
To: Jerry Quinn <jlquinn at optonline dot net>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:36:36 -0500
Subject: Re: zero-alloc cache (was Re: [v3] Fix PR libstdc++/10276)
References: <E190xa9-0006B0-00@tiamat><20030403103008.GA28026@alinoe.com><16012.17149.823856.404456@gargle.gargle.HOWL><20030411102928.GA32143@alinoe.com><20030411130221.5d78beb4.bkoz@nabi.net><16026.19124.824784.13998@gargle.gargle.HOWL><20030414122014.24efd9eb.bkoz@nabi.net><16027.34433.111860.735000@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

>Does this mean that 3.3 calls destructors on the standard streams and
>mainline does not?

I don't think so.

I don't know what is going on, sorry. I haven't looked too closely at 3.3.

-benjamin

References:
- [v3] Fix PR libstdc++/10276
  - From: Jerry Quinn
- Re: [v3] Fix PR libstdc++/10276
  - From: Carlo Wood
- zero-alloc cache (was Re: [v3] Fix PR libstdc++/10276)
  - From: Jerry Quinn
- Re: zero-alloc cache (was Re: [v3] Fix PR libstdc++/10276)
  - From: Carlo Wood
- Re: zero-alloc cache (was Re: [v3] Fix PR libstdc++/10276)
  - From: B. Kosnik
- Re: zero-alloc cache (was Re: [v3] Fix PR libstdc++/10276)
  - From: Jerry Quinn
- Re: zero-alloc cache (was Re: [v3] Fix PR libstdc++/10276)
  - From: B. Kosnik
- Re: zero-alloc cache (was Re: [v3] Fix PR libstdc++/10276)
  - From: Jerry Quinn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]