This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libstdc++/10093: Regression: Setting failbit in exceptions doesn'twork

From: Jerry Quinn <jlquinn at optonline dot net>
To: Martin Sebor <sebor at roguewave dot com>,=?unknown?q?P=E9tur_Run=F3lfsson?= <peturr02 at ru dot is>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 23:35:58 -0500
Subject: Re: libstdc++/10093: Regression: Setting failbit in exceptions doesn'twork
References: <20030326023601.19659.qmail@sources.redhat.com><07D05A69A3D0C14FAEA60C3ACE8E5564028F5560@nike.hir.is><07D05A69A3D0C14FAEA60C3ACE8E5564028F555D@nike.hir.is>

Where are we on this issue?  I'm happy to fix up the code to work the
way people want it, but there should be agreement on the desired
behavior.  I'm a bit lost on what the consensus is for exception
handling behavior.

Jerry Quinn

References:
- RE: libstdc++/10093: Regression: Setting failbit in exceptions doesn't work
  - From: Pétur Runólfsson
- RE: libstdc++/10093: Regression: Setting failbit in exceptions doesn't work
  - From: Pétur Runólfsson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]