This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 3.2 compilation problem]

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:10:52 -0600
Subject: Re: gcc 3.2 compilation problem]
References: <3DD92385.6010500@gecadsoftware.com><m3vg2uaigx.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><20021118142833.54142fa9.bkoz@redhat.com><20021118210535.GA71915@compsoc.man.ac.uk><20021118212450.GB71915@compsoc.man.ac.uk>

>Or, just mention that the simplistic version doesn't work, quoting Gaby?

I think Gaby's reponse today was the clearest I'd seen:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-11/msg00180.html

Whatever you do, please include this info. Thanks for taking care of
this: it's too bad the libstdc++ docs have been incorrect!

-benjamin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 3.2 compilation problem]
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: gcc 3.2 compilation problem]
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- gcc 3.2 compilation problem]
  - From: Paul Marculescu
- Re: gcc 3.2 compilation problem]
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: gcc 3.2 compilation problem]
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: gcc 3.2 compilation problem]
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: gcc 3.2 compilation problem]
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]