This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: a bit of rearranging?
- From: Stephen M.Webb <stephenw at cryptocard dot com>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 08:55:06 -0400
- Subject: Re: a bit of rearranging?
- References: <20020515181926.A3408@disaster.basement.lan>
- Reply-to: stephenw at cryptocard dot com
On May 15, 2002 06:19 pm, Phil Edwards wrote:
>
> Would anybody mind if I rearranged the order of some of the member
> functions so that 1) they're in more or less the same order in both
> classes, and 2) they're in more or less the same order as described
> in 14882? I don't how much time you spend reading the guts of these
> files, and didn't want to mess up anybody's scheme. Right now I'm
> jumping all over the place...
Please do rearrange them to match the standard. Its been driving me
crazy. I think I may already have done stl_list.h in my madness.
While you're doing that, is there anything to stop you from moving the
non-inline function definitions into a separate .tcc file in
anticipation of some future implementation of the export keyword, or is
that a bad idea?
--
Stephen M. Webb