This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release)
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 09:54:02PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:
>
> | In a perfect world (or at least in mine *grin*), we could tell the compiler
> | that, in the case of ambiguous matches, check to see if one of the functions
> | is in the std::rel_ops namespace, and if so, temporarily discard that one,
> | and see if the ambiguity remains. (Blue-sky idea, probably flaky.)
>
> That isn't conforming and I'm not sure I would like to implement that
> feature, I might be definitely labelled "anti-rel-ops" ;-)
Oh, it's definitely nonconforming, but most of my ideas for extensions
are nonconforming. :-)
> [ Phil, I'm getting mailer-daemon notices telling me that your address
> isn't valid. What is up? ]
There was some network flakiness earlier today. Things should be normal
again. (Note that it's no longer pedwards@, but phil@.)
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams