This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [PATCH] Builtins and C++ and such (take 3)
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell<mark at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org"<gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org"<libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 14:41:01 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Builtins and C++ and such (take 3)
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204010557320.25095-100000@www.eyesopen.com>
Roger Sayle wrote:
>For example, during the compilation of g++.dg/inherit/template-as-base.C
>using cc1plus duplicate_decls is never called! Which would also explain
>why deleting that line altogether has no effect on the regression.
>
This particular fail is not very relevant, I believe. Currently it
happens for 3.2 on many platforms also /without/ your latest one-line
patch. See, f.i.:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00006.html
Ciao, P.