This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [PATCH] Re: 3 new fails with builtin patch
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Mark Mitchell<mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 18:35:23 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: 3 new fails with builtin patch
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1020330082830.26274D-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>>Hi. However, why g++.old-deja/g++.other/builtins9.C does not fail during
>>g++ regression testing? This I cannot understand because, to be honest,
>>I don't know in detail how those tests are carried out. Perhaps are
>>build not link?!? Roger (and Mark) of course meant to link too, but...
>>
>Dunno.
>
Now I know why.
Just look at g++.log: all those g++.old-deja/g++.other tests are built
/o/n/l/y -O2
In order to properly test what was meant to test, it is needed a:
2002-03-30 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
* g++.old-deja/g++.other/builtins9.C: Build -O0.
--- builtins9.C.~1.1.~ 2002-03-29 21:41:51.000000000 +0100
+++ builtins9.C 2002-03-30 18:29:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
// Test that inline redeclarations of builtins are emitted.
// Origin: Roger Sayle Mar 28, 2002
+// Special g++ Options: -O0
// Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation.
namespace std {
Ciao.
P.