This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Thread safety of basic_string

From: Nathan Myers <ncm-nospam at cantrip dot org>
To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:06:41 +0000
Subject: Re: Thread safety of basic_string
References: <1006488958.7574.6.camel@mu.incompleteness.net> <wvlg0757mmo.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 11:27:43AM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote:
> FWIW, SGI argued a while back that a reference-counted implementation of
> basic_string isn't very viable with threads:
> 
>   http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/string_discussion.html

It was a specious argument, when examined.  It's disgraceful
that they left it posted, as-is.

Nathan Myers
ncm at cantrip dot org

References:
- Thread safety of basic_string
  - From: Dan McGuirk
- Re: Thread safety of basic_string
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]