Pseudo-unreviewed patches

[Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>]

There are three patches that I've had in my local tree for a while.  I'd
want to either check them in or throw them out before starting work on the
"solaris long long" problem.  In random order:


[1]  fstream should check the result of explicit close()
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-10/msg00113.html
Nathan asked a question, I answered, no more responses.


[2]
> 2001-08-09
>       Opinions on libstdc++/3955 patch?
>       http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-08/msg00066.html

Nathan talked some about the idea, but I never got any followup to this:

    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-09/msg00023.html

It's the "ignoring openmode app" fix.


[3]
> 2001-09-05
>         concept-checks changes
>         http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-09/msg00026.html
>         (file under, should go in)

Say the word and it's in.  :-)

Actually, my doxygen markups are about to overlap the c-c changes, so I'd
really like to get this in before doing much more, uh, doxygenning.


-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams