This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: merging from new parser branch (was Re: Common V3 coding bug)
- To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Subject: Re: merging from new parser branch (was Re: Common V3 coding bug)
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:24:00 -0700
> Other branches have added tags like 'new_wonkulator_mergepoint_20001234',
> presumably to make future merging easier. Do we need to do that?
> I wouldn't think so, if the trunk is canonical for v3, but I'll abide by
> y'all's decision.
>
No need.
> Also:
>
>> > > There might be bits
>> > > that you would rather I'd do differently; for example, I've used
>> > > `using base::member;' rather than `this->member' in some of the
>> > > changes thus far.
>
> No you haven't. :-) Or rather, the only diffs showing up in my merge are
> things like adding 'template<>' to specializations, and 'typename' at the
> appropriate points. I haven't seen any 'this->member' nor 'base::member'
> showing up. Have such changes already been checked into the trunk?
Nope; they're still on my local disk. :-( I'll be making another check-in
soon, so you'll see them when you check again in a week or two...
Thanks for helping with this!
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com