This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: mkcheck and rpath

To: Jason Merrill <jason_merrill at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: mkcheck and rpath
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
Date: 23 May 2001 19:40:11 +0200
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS UMR 8536 (France)
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010522162337.24915B-100000@taarna.cygnus.com> <m3d790s66j.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>

Jason Merrill <jason_merrill@redhat.com> writes:

| >>>>> "Benjamin" == Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
| 
| >> Why was libtool ditched?
| 
| > ...because cross compilers don't play well with libtool --mode=execute. 
| > In particular, abstractions for running on a simulator (or multiple 
| > kinds of simulator) have to exist.
| 
| Seems like that should be fixed.  Of course, that could be a big job...I
| wonder how difficult it would be to dynamically extract that information
| from dejagnu?

Couldn't we use libtool form native testing and libgloss for crosses? 

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mkcheck and rpath
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

References:
- Re: mkcheck and rpath
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: mkcheck and rpath
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]