This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
- To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Subject: Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
- Date: 06 Apr 2001 20:26:19 +0200
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, Peter Schmid <schmid at snake dot iap dot physik dot tu-darmstadt dot de>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS UMR 8536 (France)
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010405164608.27670A-100000@cse.cygnus.com> <fln19ug7zz.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010406143453.B19460@disaster.jaj.com>
Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com> writes:
| On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 02:57:36AM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
| >
| > | I'm wondering if concept checking should be off by default. Thoughts? At
| > | least on the branch, it might make sense to disable it by default.
| >
| > For the time being I would suggest on both branch and mainline. Until
| > we find a solution.
|
| I'm worried that if we disable the checks we'll never solve the bug.
Agreed, but we should not offer the "buggy" code by default. It is
better, IMO, to let users ask for it. Of course, we can encourage
them to test/experiment the concept checking support but in the
current state it should not be the default.
-- Gaby