This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
- To: Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr (Gabriel Dos Reis)
- Subject: Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
- From: Joe Buck <jbuck at racerx dot synopsys dot com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr (Gabriel Dos Reis), jason_merrill at redhat dot com (Jason Merrill), bkoz at redhat dot com (Benjamin Kosnik), jbuck at synopsys dot COM (Joe Buck), libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
> | Note that http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/ talks about the multivendor
> | ABI -- we never signed up, nor should we sign up, to having our library
> | interoperable with other vendors' libraries.
>
> If you don't want GCC/g++ comply to the multivendor ABI, that is not an
> issue I'll dispute with you. It *is* the fact that ABI is implemented
> in the compiler.
No, that's not what I'm saying. The ABI as described is fine. I'm just
saying that I see no reason to force our library to be exactly the same
as everyone else's.