This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3] default to --disable-long-long, ctype fixes
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: [v3] default to --disable-long-long, ctype fixes
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Date: 21 Dec 2000 02:30:44 +0000
- Cc: george at moberg dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, bkoz at redhat dot com
- References: <3A40FFED.93F8D5AE@moberg.com><firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>>>> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Dos Reis <email@example.com> writes:
> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
> | Turning off --enable-long-long is a really serious hardship for those
> | who need it on. It means we have to recompile libstdc++-v3, right? Or
> | since the compiler's now merged in, we would have to recompile both,
> | right? I would seriously prefer to use the binaries as shipped with the
> | distribution(s), rather than having to recompile all this.
> Can you elaborate on this? As far as I can tell we do not distribute
> v3 binaries; and with the last snapshot it appears that V3 is being
> thighly coupled with 2.97 or higher; so if you consider using current
> CVS V3 then you have to recompile it anyway.
I believe he is referring to the situation after 3.0 is released and Linux
vendors start shipping it. It is important for people to be able to use
the libstdc++ shipped with their system; requiring people to grab the
source from somewhere and rebuild just so they can use long long just isn't