Re: Patch to CVSROOT/loginfo

[Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>]

On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> This, and changing egcs to gcc, are fine. However, I'd prefer someone else
>> to look at the other change.
> Could someone look at this?  Until the gcc names are added to the egcs
> ones (the egcs ones can't be removed until commits under the egcs name
> are disallowed), any changes I make, or anyone else with a tree checked out
> under the gcc name rather than the egcs name makes, will not go to
> libstdc++-cvs even if they change libstdc++-v3.  The changes from
> sources.redhat.com to gcc.gnu.org for the libstdc++ list addresses are on
> the same theme of getting rid of obsolete names.

Could you send an updated patch, please?  That might increase the chance
that someone will have a look, I'd hope.

I'm also Cc:ing the libstdc++ list so that Benjamin won't miss it.

> [Are the libstdc++-v3-auto-checkout rules still relevant for the current
> libstdc++-v3 onlinedocs situation, or do they just check out into an
> obsolete sources.redhat.com web tree?]

If think the latter holds, which means that we should be able to just
remove this.

Benjamin? Phil?

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/