This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the libstdc++ project. See the libstdc++ home page for more information.
>>>>> Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br> writes: > On Nov 2, 1998, Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br> writes: >>> Within the scope of S<T>, `a', `S::a' and `S<T>::a' are all the same >>> thing >> Nope. S::a and S<T>::a are the same, but they are dependent, and `a' is >> not. g++ doesn't currently implement that consistently. > The point I was trying to make is that they *should* be the same > thing. And my point is that the standard says they aren't. Jason