This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath?

To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Subject: Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath?
From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 22:58:46 +0100
Cc: martin dot kahlert at infineon dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010920141222.A23627@keksy.muc.infineon.com> <3BAA1CE8.5090608@bothner.com> <20010920193708.A3669@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <3BAA47AF.4050205@bothner.com>

Per Bothner wrote:-

> I was waiting for approval.  I guess technically as a cpplib maintainer I
> could check in it, but I wouldn't feel comfortable about it.  But with
> your (additional) approval and no objections, I guess I'll go ahead.

Hmm, I'm not a configury expert by any means.  Maybe Zack could have a
look too; he's a lot more familiar with that stuff than me.  Zack?

> >This would close the PR you filed, wouldn't it?
> >
> Which PR?

3104.  I seem to recall a small thread about this very topic from
around that time.

Neil.

References:
- Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath?
  - From: Martin Kahlert
- Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath?
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath?
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath?
  - From: Per Bothner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]