This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Make driver process options with *.opt machinery

From: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:31:23 +0200
Subject: Re: Make driver process options with *.opt machinery
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008122131420.28932@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On 08/12/2010 11:33 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

Bootstrapped with no regressions on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.  OK to
commit?

fortran:
2010-08-12  Joseph Myers<joseph@codesourcery.com>
	* lang.opt (MDX, MMDX): Mark RejectDriver.

The Fortran bits are OK (Java and middle-end have been approved by others) - I think the Fortran changes are close to obvious.

However, I wonder about the following (cf. excerpt below), namely about the MissingArgError; shouldn't one use this for all *.opt files?

Tobias

+++ gcc-mainline/gcc/c-family/c.opt	2010-08-12 02:48:01.000000000 -0700
MDX
-C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Separate MissingArgError(missing filename after %qs)
+C ObjC C++ ObjC++ RejectDriver Separate MissingArgError(missing filename after %qs)

+++ gcc-mainline/gcc/fortran/lang.opt	2010-08-12 02:48:14.000000000 -0700
  MDX
-Fortran Separate
+Fortran Separate RejectDriver

+++ gcc-mainline/gcc/java/lang.opt	2010-08-12 02:47:21.000000000 -0700
  MD_
-Java Undocumented
+Java Undocumented RejectDriver

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Make driver process options with *.opt machinery
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- Make driver process options with *.opt machinery
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]