This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [PATCH] libjava: Add option to disable BC ABI in libgcj.
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:09:09 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] libjava: Add option to disable BC ABI in libgcj.
- References: <476C3D6A.6060704@avtrex.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712301502360.25278@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <479AC29F.9050909@avtrex.com> <479B1090.9090307@redhat.com> <479BAB00.2000202@avtrex.com> <479C5E29.6000607@redhat.com>
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, David Daney wrote:
>> See ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/summit/2004/GCJ%20New%20ABI.pdf
> While I could certainly reference this paper, I am not sure that install.texi
> is the best place for such a reference.
>
> I was thinking that if someone wanted to know the gory details, they could
> look up -findirect-dispatch. I was trying to keep the install documentation
> as small as possible while still describing what the new option does.
Fair enough. Should that link be added to gcj.texi, then?
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> I don't think so, but I have a limited grasp of the English language. I
>> will defer to others on which of 'affected' or 'effected' should be used
>> here.
> OK, so take it from me: it's "affected".
;-) David, I assume Andrew is going to give the final Ack for the patch
(or has done so already). Just make sure you won't stall on me, I was
mainly trying to give some feedback.
Gerald