This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation part 0/9 (table of contents)
- From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
- To: Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, Brooks Moses <brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com>, Lee Millward <lee dot millward at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:02:43 +0100
- Subject: Re: PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation part 0/9 (table of contents)
- References: <45CDE071.6000705@codesourcery.com> <200702101625.36894.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <45CF1FD7.3020308@codesourcery.com>
> OK, I've testing SPARC. Doing so actually turned up a bug in our
> builtins.c changes, rather than in anything in config/sparc. :-P (Looking
> at it in more detail, I found that some bad changes were accidentally
> introduced in doing the merge from my original version on the LTO branch.)
Thanks. Not sure whether you tested native or cross but, in the former case
and for this kind of somewhat mechanical changes, you can limit yourself to a
bootstrap/regtest for the C family of compilers.
--
Eric Botcazou