This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Patch [ecj]: Central Parking


Mohan Embar writes:

 > This does away with _Jv_ThreadPark and _Jv_ThreadUnpark and keeps
 > park() and unpark() in natUnsafe.cc, thereby allowing a shared
 > implementation using the cross-platform synchronization functions
 > and objects in posix-threads.h and win32-threads.h.  Since the
 > park() implementation uses _Jv_CondNotify, we also get thread
 > interrupt support for free and can do away with the
 > _Jv_ThreadUnpark call in Thread.interrupt().

Surely it's possible to avoid this: the POSIX version doesn't need to
call _Jv_CondWait and _Jv_CondNotify, and I don't see why the Win
version should either.  But I guess I don't really mind what the Win
version does, as long as it passes the tests.

It would be nice if we had Win versions of pthread_cond_* with no
additional side-effects, and we could use those.

 > I hope I did this right and understood everything correctly.
 > 
 > I built this on a native i686-pc-linux-gnu compiler as
 > well as a (i686-pc-linux-gnu,i686-pc-mingw32) cross, but didn't
 > see any tests in the libjava testsuite for this, so it's
 > untested. I figure that since it compiled without any
 > errors, it must work flawlessly, but it would be nice to
 > have a second set of eyes here.

I used the TCK at
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/test/tck/.

Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]