This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Permissions not checked in BC-ABI code

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:27:24 +0100
Subject: Re: Permissions not checked in BC-ABI code
References: <17513.58386.629191.792573@dell.pink> <m3fyjahv8u.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

Tom Tromey writes:
 > >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
 > 
 > Andrew> We're not checking permissions correctly when linking BC-ABI method
 > Andrew> calls.  This allows access to private methods, etc.  
 > 
 > Ouch.
 > 
 > It's well past time we had a vm-level test suite... :(
 > 
 > Andrew> This is going to require some fairly extended testing to make sure it
 > Andrew> doesn't break anything, which I'll do before I check it in.
 > 
 > The patch looks reasonable to me.  I suspect, unfortunately, that
 > we're going to want to defer the IllegalAccessError here.

I'm not sure.  Can you make me a testcase for that?

TVM,
Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Permissions not checked in BC-ABI code
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Permissions not checked in BC-ABI code
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Permissions not checked in BC-ABI code
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Permissions not checked in BC-ABI code
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]