This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Ping: patch for configure bug, PR libgcj/19877
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Jun 2005 13:54:20 -0600
- Subject: Re: Ping: patch for configure bug, PR libgcj/19877
- References: <m3psuqdkd8.fsf@localhost.localdomain><200506132304.j5DN4kcL014715@greed.delorie.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "DJ" == DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q2/msg00528.html
DJ> Have you tried it with only the "!= xno" half of the conditional? It
DJ> looks like, if you test that, you don't also need to test if it's set,
DJ> since "not set" is a subset of "not no".
I agree; I tested that and it worked. I'm checking in the patch with
this change.
Tom