This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Ping: patch for configure bug, PR libgcj/19877
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: tromey at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:04:46 -0400
- Subject: Re: Ping: patch for configure bug, PR libgcj/19877
- References: <m3psuqdkd8.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q2/msg00528.html
Have you tried it with only the "!= xno" half of the conditional? It
looks like, if you test that, you don't also need to test if it's set,
since "not set" is a subset of "not no".
Otherwise, OK.