This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch][RFC] Introduction of gnu.classpath.SystemProperties

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Cc: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>, Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 25 Apr 2005 13:51:32 -0600
Subject: Re: [Patch][RFC] Introduction of gnu.classpath.SystemProperties
References: <20050422061001.GA11418@asterix.konqueror.de><42693D05.10502@redhat.com><1114202025.27918.25.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> writes:

Mark> This is enforced by the (default) system class loader from GNU Classpath
Mark> which does a SecurityManager.checkPackageAccess(). See the discussion
Mark> following the original patch by Jeroen:
Mark> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath-patches/2004-12/msg00035.html

I filed this as PR 21222 so we don't forget it.  Also, as discussed on
irc today, apparently Classpath doesn't actually set the property that
would cause this check to really work.

Tom

References:
- [Patch][RFC] Introduction of gnu.classpath.SystemProperties
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: [Patch][RFC] Introduction of gnu.classpath.SystemProperties
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: [Patch][RFC] Introduction of gnu.classpath.SystemProperties
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]