This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix pr16789 failures on the SPARC

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 05 Jan 2005 10:20:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix pr16789 failures on the SPARC
References: <200501032135.12009.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr><m3llb9gctx.fsf@localhost.localdomain><200501042251.15457.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr><41DB1DD6.8030608@redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com> writes:

Bryce> In any case, libgcj should not be considered frozen -
Bryce> especially for bug fixes - just because the compiler is in
Bryce> regression-only mode.

Mark specifically asked language maintainers not to violate the
regression-only rule.  It is unclear if this really applied to Java
(given earlier statements of his, like at the Summit), but we never
asked... but now we don't have to, today he change the status to
"normal stage 3", meaning ordinary bug fixes are ok.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix pr16789 failures on the SPARC
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- [PATCH] Fix pr16789 failures on the SPARC
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix pr16789 failures on the SPARC
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [PATCH] Fix pr16789 failures on the SPARC
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix pr16789 failures on the SPARC
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]