This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: natThread.cc: Destroy join sync objects in finalizer


>>>>> "Mohan" == Mohan Embar <gnustuff@thisiscool.com> writes:

Mohan> The GC finalizer finalize_native in natThread.cc should destroy
Mohan> the join synchronization objects if the target platform supports
Mohan> these destruction operations (which isn't the case for Linux and
Mohan> -DLINUX_THREADS but is the case for Win32).

This isn't a problem with your patch, but what happens if a user
writes a subclass of Thread that has a finalize method which
resurrects the Thread?  Won't we start referring to freed data in this
code?

Probably instead of a finalizer we should use a reference queue here
instead.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]