This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [BC] Patch: FYI: access check without initialization
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 01 Sep 2004 20:11:40 -0600
- Subject: Re: [BC] Patch: FYI: access check without initialization
- References: <87k6vdeks4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <41364BEC.9010004@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com> writes:
Bryce> It *should* be safe to instead change _Jv_CheckAccess to use
Bryce> _Jv_IsAssignableFrom (which doesnt initialize). If there are other
Bryce> cases where _Jv_CheckAccess could be called with a non-prepared class
Bryce> argument, they should be fixed.
Yeah, I agree. I put this on my list for the class preparation
cleanup.
Tom