This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 17:27, jlquinn@optonline.net wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 07:10, Jerry Quinn wrote: > > > This depends on http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2004-q2/msg00739.html > > > > > > 2004-06-24 Jerry Quinn <jlquinn@optonline.net> > > > > > > * java/beans/Expression.java: New. > > > * Makefile.am: Add Expression.java. > > > * Makefile.in: Regenerate. > > > > Very nice. Thanks for working on these classes. > > Are you still waiting for approval to check them in? > > Thanks. Both the Expression.java and Statement.java patches are waiting for > approval. > > > Class klazz = (target instanceof Class) > > ? (Class) target : target.getClass(); > > > > What do you think? > > I also discovered this while testing Expression and have an equivalent fix in > my Statement.java, but hadn't posted it. Yours is cleaner, though. Cool. I think after review by Michael and with this or a similar fixlet both should go in. I cannot approve them for libgcj, but I intend to make sure they go into GNU Classpath before the 0.10 snapshot release. Tom? Bryce? Cheers, Mark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |