Re: gtk-peer compile fixes for gcc-2.95

[Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>]

Hi,

On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 04:00, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> Michael> We had this discussion on irc lately because I got a report
> Michael> about this from a user. Tromey said the best solution would
> Michael> be to pass -std=c99 (or similar) to gcc instead of changing
> Michael> the source code. Its a discussion C89 vs. C99.
> 
> Actually I think I'd prefer we change the source and use -std=c89.
> I'm assuming C89 is what Classpath native code is supposed to be
> written in.

I don't believe it is really designed for a particular C-dialect. But it
would be nice if it is compilable with gcc-2.95. It seems gcc-2.95
supports -std=c9x so we can switch to that. But I cannot figure out how
to convince Autoconf that I want that dialect used for my C files. Clues
anybody?

Thanks,

Mark

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part