This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: New lang hook: ok_for_sibcall

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 18:23:12 +0100
Subject: Re: New lang hook: ok_for_sibcall
References: <16075.42961.406514.46693@cuddles.redhat.com><20030521172035.GA9346@ceres.cs.mu.oz.au>

Fergus Henderson writes:
 > On 21-May-2003, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
 > > Sibcalls break Java programs in interesting ways.  To fix this while
 > > still allowing sibcalls to be used where it won't hurt, I need to be
 > > able to control when a sibcall is allowed.
 > 
 > What about sibcalls via function pointers?
 > For those, fndecl in expand_call() will be a null pointer.
 > Your patch doesn't seem to handle that case.

It doesn't need to.  The test 'fndecl == NULL_TREE' is before the call
to ok_for_sibcall.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New lang hook: ok_for_sibcall
  - From: Fergus Henderson

References:
- New lang hook: ok_for_sibcall
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: New lang hook: ok_for_sibcall
  - From: Fergus Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]