This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
- From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:23:18 +1300
- Subject: Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
- References: <20020217005638.A9525@redhat.com> <orofijmrfh.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20020221000218.B18952@redhat.com> <ory9hm60hw.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20020221124457.B19445@redhat.com> <orheoa5xdf.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20020221141806.A19560@redhat.com> <or8z9m5tzf.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20020221153343.A19615@redhat.com> <or4rka430j.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>It has the unfortunate (?) side effect that the two
>programs linked in libjava, rmic and rmiregistry, are now explicitly
>linked with the shared libgcc, instead of only inheriting that from
>libgcj
>
Thats not a problem. gcj implicitly links shared libgcc anyway. In fact
it used to be that libgcj was not linked against libgcc (because libtool
linked it using "gcc", and didnt pass the -shared-libgcc flag), but it
didnt matter because all Java binaries were.
regards
Bryce.