This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Revision control systems [Was: I broke the build]

From: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: Adam Megacz <patches at lists dot megacz dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:32:03 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: Revision control systems [Was: I broke the build]
References: <866659d36x.fsf@megacz.com><874rkt5b82.fsf@creche.redhat.com><868za4scfv.fsf@megacz.com><874rksdour.fsf@creche.redhat.com><86heor3wyq.fsf_-_@megacz.com><87aduiy3ih.fsf@creche.redhat.com>

Tom Tromey writes:
 > 
 > cvs isn't as bad as many people claim.  It has flaws, but they are
 > well known and don't regularly interfere with one's work.

cvs is a solid battle-hardened product.  If I had to choose a system
today it would be cvs.  Bleeding edge software for version control?
No thanks!

 > 
 > You could always try subversion.  It might not be reliable enough yet.
 > This is the program I think will become the successor of cvs.

I think so too.

Andrew.

References:
- I broke the build
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: I broke the build
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: I broke the build
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: I broke the build
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Revision control systems [Was: I broke the build]
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: Revision control systems [Was: I broke the build]
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]