This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: request for blanket commit privs to *win32*
- From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- To: Adam Megacz <patches at lists dot megacz dot com>
- Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 15:47:26 +1300
- Subject: Re: request for blanket commit privs to *win32*
- References: <86lme7odo9.fsf@megacz.com>
Adam Megacz wrote:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2002-q1/msg00214.html
>
> Basically, "unsigned jint" doesn't work, so I suggest using
> uint<foo>_t (from stdint.h, part of the C99 standard) in shs.cc. I'd
> like to know if this is acceptable, and if not, what I should use
> instead.
>
The uint*_t is probibly fairly universal, but I'm not so sure about
stdint.h. In SunOS 5.5 they are in <inttypes.h>, so it might be wise to
at least wrap the include with a HAVE_STDINT_H or something. I guess if
anyone wants to build libjava on such a platform they can figure out
what to do and send us a patch.
Darwin has about the crapiest headers of any "current" unix, so if it
works there then its probibly going to work on most targets!
>To make things move more quickly, may I please have permission to
>commit to the following files without waiting for review?
>
> libjava/win32.cc
> libjava/win32-threads.cc
> libjava/include/win32-threads.h
> libjava/include/win32-signals.h
> libjava/java/*/*Win32*
>
>I'll still post my patches, I'd just like to be able to commit them
>without having to wait a week and repost a few times.
>
Yes, I have no objection to that.
regards
Bryce.