This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Commit messages and the move to git
On 21/11/2019 16:40, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
>> Richard Earnshaw (lists) <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>:
>> > Nope, that was from running the go version from yesterday. This one, to
>> > be precise: 1ab3c514c6cd5e1a5d6b68a8224df299751ca637
>> >
>> > This pass used to be very fast a couple of weeks back, but something
>> > went in recently that's caused a major slowdown.
>> >
>> > Oh, and I've been having problems with the ChangeLogs command as well.
>> > It used to run fine on my machine (128G), but now it's started blowing
>> > memory and taking my X server down.
>>
>> That sucks. Those were stretches of code the two guys working with me
>> have been trying to speed up. Looks like that backfired.
>>
>> Please file isses at https://gitlab.com/esr/reposurgeon/issues and
>> include timing reports if you can.
>
> I see the changelogs issue is fixed (I can run a conversion past that
> point on a system with 128GB memory, with mergeinfo processing being very
> slow as described by Richard). But then I get errors:
>
Eric, now that the changelogs command can take a selection set, do you
have a suggestion for how we might construct a sets that are just the
merge commands, or just the copies? Both of these seem to get the wrong
author attribution and it would be nice to exclude them.
R.
> *** Unknown syntax: relax
>
> followed by the "tag /branch-root|branchpoint/ delete" command giving an
> error
>
> reposurgeon: assignments invalidated by GC
>
> and a "script abort" in conversion.log, after which it starts writing out
> gcc.fi (I think without processing any of the rest of gcc.lift). I don't
> know whether the above errors are bugs in reposurgeon or in the
> gcc-conversion scripts.
>
> --
> Joseph S. Myers
> joseph@codesourcery.com