This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
August 31, 2019
22:40 | gcc-9-20190831 is now available | gccadmin |
14:34 | ✑ Wassup. I`m posted mine porn pics for you. | Ellis Harry |
August 30, 2019
22:40 | gcc-8-20190830 is now available | gccadmin |
20:35 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
20:24 | Re: Rust front-end | Mateus Carmo Martins de Freita |
19:12 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
10:46 | gccnetwork system | Sales dot 25 at WARNERTELE dot |
07:57 | Fiberglass Sleevings & Heat Shrink Tubes | Ms Pooja 8928403615 |
07:57 | Fiberglass Sleevings & Heat Shrink Tubes | Ms Pooja 8928403615 |
August 29, 2019
22:40 | gcc-7-20190829 is now available | gccadmin |
15:28 | Re: Question about make_extraction() in combine.c | Michael Eager |
14:47 | [GSoC-19] Adding functions in math.h as built-ins | Tejas Joshi |
14:46 | Re: enable_shared_from_this fails at runtime when inherited privately | Christian Schneider |
12:57 | Get started and discover how to isolate “resting trends”, buy them, and watch them snap back to life | Ellis Percival |
11:45 | Re: enable_shared_from_this fails at runtime when inherited privately | Jonathan Wakely |
11:43 | Re: enable_shared_from_this fails at runtime when inherited privately | Jonathan Wakely |
10:50 | Re: enable_shared_from_this fails at runtime when inherited privately | Christian Schneider |
10:07 | Re: enable_shared_from_this fails at runtime when inherited privately | Jonathan Wakely |
09:15 | enable_shared_from_this fails at runtime when inherited privately | Christian Schneider |
August 28, 2019
19:33 | Re: Question about make_extraction() in combine.c | Segher Boessenkool |
August 27, 2019
16:38 | Re: Question about make_extraction() in combine.c | Michael Eager |
14:58 | Re: Rust front-end | David Malcolm |
09:34 | Re: Rust front-end | Jonathan Wakely |
08:10 | Re: Rust front-end | Bin.Cheng |
August 26, 2019
13:23 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Martin Jambor |
11:35 | Global B2B Emails List | jeremy . wasik |
07:42 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
07:07 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
August 25, 2019
22:42 | gcc-10-20190825 is now available | gccadmin |
16:47 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
13:55 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
09:38 | Re: [PATCH] Builtin function roundeven folding implementation | Martin Jambor |
08:25 | Re: [PATCH] Builtin function roundeven folding implementation | Tejas Joshi |
07:49 | Re: Re: [GSoC'19, libgomp work-stealing] Task parallelism runtime | 김규래 |
August 24, 2019
22:41 | gcc-9-20190824 is now available | gccadmin |
09:53 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Richard Sandiford |
August 23, 2019
22:41 | gcc-8-20190823 is now available | gccadmin |
19:13 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
18:59 | Re: gcc vs clang for non-power-2 atomic structures | Iain Sandoe |
18:49 | Re: gcc vs clang for non-power-2 atomic structures | Jim Wilson |
17:52 | Re: _Nomodify extension idea for optimization and safety | Martin Sebor |
17:17 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Martin Jambor |
16:44 | _Nomodify extension idea for optimization and safety | MCC CS |
16:14 | Re: gcc vs clang for non-power-2 atomic structures | Joseph Myers |
14:11 | Rust front-end | Mateus Carmo Martins de Freita |
11:17 | Re: gcc vs clang for non-power-2 atomic structures | Jonathan Wakely |
10:13 | Re: gcc vs clang for non-power-2 atomic structures | Iain Sandoe |
09:36 | Re: gcc vs clang for non-power-2 atomic structures | Jonathan Wakely |
07:21 | Re: gcc vs clang for non-power-2 atomic structures | Iain Sandoe |
02:18 | How to insert a new function in plugin? | John Reed |
August 22, 2019
23:56 | gcc vs clang for non-power-2 atomic structures | Jim Wilson |
22:40 | gcc-7-20190822 is now available | gccadmin |
18:19 | Re: [EXT] Re: How does one traverse all the global decls | Gary Oblock |
17:00 | Re: [PATCH] Builtin function roundeven folding implementation | Joseph Myers |
16:56 | Re: [PATCH] Builtin function roundeven folding implementation | Tejas Joshi |
16:35 | Re: [PATCH] Builtin function roundeven folding implementation | Joseph Myers |
16:28 | Re: [PATCH] Builtin function roundeven folding implementation | Tejas Joshi |
10:49 | Re: How does one traverse all the global decls | Richard Biener |
09:56 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
09:16 | Re: How does one traverse all the global decls | Martin Jambor |
07:57 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
06:25 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
03:33 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
August 21, 2019
21:33 | How does one traverse all the global decls | Gary Oblock |
19:17 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
18:28 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
17:35 | Re: asking for __attribute__((aligned()) clarification | Jonathan Wakely |
17:20 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
16:50 | Re: asking for __attribute__((aligned()) clarification | Paul Koning |
14:58 | Re: asking for __attribute__((aligned()) clarification | Alexander Monakov |
14:32 | Re: asking for __attribute__((aligned()) clarification | Paul Koning |
14:29 | Re: Aw: Re: asking for __attribute__((aligned()) clarification | Alexander Monakov |
12:29 | Re: For which gcc release is going to be foreseen the support for the Coroutines TS extension? | Iain Sandoe |
August 20, 2019
August 19, 2019
August 18, 2019
22:41 | gcc-10-20190818 is now available | gccadmin |
10:59 | [wwwdocs PATCH] for Re: autovectorization in gcc | Gerald Pfeifer |
August 17, 2019
22:42 | gcc-9-20190817 is now available | gccadmin |
08:21 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Richard Sandiford |
05:40 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
03:52 | Question about pass_fix_loops or other loop fixing classes | xerofoify |
August 16, 2019
22:40 | gcc-8-20190816 is now available | gccadmin |
14:50 | Re: Special Memory Constraint [was Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra] | Vladimir Makarov |
11:24 | Special Memory Constraint [was Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra] | John Darrington |
10:23 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Richard Sandiford |
00:50 | Successful builds of GCC 9.2 on Darwin | Iain Sandoe |
August 15, 2019
22:40 | gcc-7-20190815 is now available | gccadmin |
21:22 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Segher Boessenkool |
18:54 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
18:45 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
18:30 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Vladimir Makarov |
18:23 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Vladimir Makarov |
17:41 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | John Darrington |
17:36 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | John Darrington |
16:38 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Richard Biener |
16:29 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Vladimir Makarov |
13:55 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
12:47 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Richard Sandiford |
09:52 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
09:12 | Successful build of gcc 9.2.0 on x86_64-w64-mingw32 | Rainer Emrich |
August 14, 2019
21:00 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
20:23 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Joseph Myers |
20:21 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
16:11 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Joseph Myers |
07:21 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
06:15 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
August 12, 2019
21:52 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
21:20 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Joseph Myers |
17:55 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
17:25 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
13:35 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Vladimir Makarov |
09:14 | GCC 9.3 Status Report (2019-08-12) | Jakub Jelinek |
09:10 | GCC 9.2 Released | Jakub Jelinek |
08:40 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Segher Boessenkool |
06:47 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | John Darrington |
August 11, 2019
22:41 | gcc-10-20190811 is now available | gccadmin |
16:59 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
16:07 | SSA Trees and Lockless Implementation | xerofoify |
12:46 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
07:20 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
04:58 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
August 10, 2019
22:41 | gcc-9-20190810 is now available | gccadmin |
17:06 | Re: Using gcc/ChangeLog instead of gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog? | Segher Boessenkool |
16:46 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Segher Boessenkool |
16:15 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Segher Boessenkool |
16:12 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Segher Boessenkool |
10:24 | Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions | Tejas Joshi |
10:13 | Re: Using gcc/ChangeLog instead of gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog? | Jakub Jelinek |
06:53 | Using gcc/ChangeLog instead of gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog? | Hans-Peter Nilsson |
06:10 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | John Darrington |
06:06 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | John Darrington |
August 09, 2019
22:40 | gcc-8-20190809 is now available | gccadmin |
19:55 | Fw:Halöle | Camo Johnson |
17:34 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Vladimir Makarov |
16:07 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Jeff Law |
14:23 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Paul Koning |
14:17 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | Segher Boessenkool |
08:14 | Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | John Darrington |
08:06 | Re: Use predicates for RTL objects | Richard Biener |
07:31 | Status of gcc 9.1.1 rev. 274208 on x86_64-w64-mingw32 | Rainer Emrich |
August 08, 2019
August 07, 2019
19:06 | Copyright assignment forms | Arvind Sankar |
18:58 | Re: Use predicates for RTL objects | Arvind Sankar |
18:05 | Re: Use predicates for RTL objects | Segher Boessenkool |
17:40 | Re: Use predicates for RTL objects | Arvind Sankar |
17:33 | Re: Use predicates for RTL objects | Segher Boessenkool |
16:15 | Use predicates for RTL objects | Arvind Sankar |
06:07 | Nota Fiscal Emitida: - 1PG1NI80CDEQ035 | NFe Departamento Fiscal-046 |
August 06, 2019
20:24 | Supply Chain Managers Contacts | Linda Hitchcock |
15:40 | Re: [GSoC-19] Implementing narrowing functions like fadd | Tejas Joshi |
07:17 | Re: GCC 9.2 Status Report (2019-08-05), branch frozen for release | Jakub Jelinek |
07:12 | Re: GCC 9.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org | Iain Sandoe |
August 05, 2019
17:03 | Re: GCC 9.2 Status Report (2019-08-05), branch frozen for release | Martin Sebor |
16:30 | Re: GCC 9.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org | Bill Seurer |
13:22 | GCC 9.2 Status Report (2019-08-05), branch frozen for release | Jakub Jelinek |
13:16 | GCC 9.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org | Jakub Jelinek |
11:01 | Re: Re: [GSoC'19, libgomp work-stealing] Task parallelism runtime | 김규래 |
10:32 | Re: Re: [GSoC'19, libgomp work-stealing] Task parallelism runtime | Jakub Jelinek |
10:16 | Salem | Salem Alkhrusi |
August 04, 2019
22:41 | gcc-10-20190804 is now available | gccadmin |
19:18 | Indirect memory addresses vs. lra | John Darrington |
10:59 | Parallelize GCC with Threads project | Mustafa GÜNDOĞDU |
August 03, 2019
22:48 | France TV : ç a l'air d'un canular, Mais... | maryline |
22:41 | gcc-9-20190803 is now available | gccadmin |
09:12 | Re: Re: [GSoC'19, libgomp work-stealing] Task parallelism runtime | 김규래 |
August 02, 2019
22:40 | gcc-8-20190802 is now available | gccadmin |
19:08 | Creation of Pocket Site! | Ana |
10:34 | Re: [GSoC-19] Implementing narrowing functions like fadd | Tejas Joshi |
August 01, 2019
22:39 | gcc-7-20190801 is now available | gccadmin |
15:09 | European Microwave Exhibition 2019 | Tammy Walker |
09:47 | Re: Disappeared flag: -maes on -march=ivybridge, present in -march=native | Kevin Weidemann |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]