This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: License compliance on updating gcc runtime libraries
> That depends on your local copyright law. Some, like the US, have
> language saying that copies necessary for usual operation are *not*
> covered under copyright.
I'm refering to US law. Where, precisely, is the language you are
referring to? Note that there are two separate issues:
(1) Whether executing a program is considered making a copy under
(2) Whether somebody has an implicit right to make such a copy.
Which of these two are you addressing?
Note that there are cases where copyright law acknowleges that
something is a copy, but permits making that copy. "Fair use" is
probably the best known of those.