This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [EXT] Re: GCC missing -flto optimizations? SPEC lbm benchmark
Steve Ellcey <firstname.lastname@example.org> 于2019年2月16日周六 上午1:53写道：
> On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 17:48 +0800, Jun Ma wrote:
> > ICC is doing much more than GCC in ipo, especially memory layout
> > optimizations. See https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/522667.
> > ICC is more aggressive in array transposition/structure splitting
> > /field reordering. However, these optimizations have been removed
> > from GCC long time ago.
> > As for case lbm_r, IIRC a loop with memory access which stride is 20 is
> > most time-consuming. ICC will optimize the array(maybe structure?)
> > and vectorize the loop under ipo.
> > Thanks
> > Jun
> Interesting. I tried using '-qno-opt-mem-layout-trans' on ICC
> along with '-Ofast -ipo' and that had no affect on the speed. I also
> tried '-no-vec' and that had no affect either. The only thing that
> slowed down ICC was '-ip-no-inlining' or '-fno-inline'. I see that
> '-Ofast -ipo' resulted in everything (except libc functions) getting
> inlined into the main program when using ICC. GCC did not do that, but
> if I forced it to by using the always_inline attribute, GCC could
> inline everything into main the way ICC does. But that did not speed
> up the GCC executable.
> Steve Ellcey
you can use '-qopt-report' to see which optimizations has been applied by