This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Repo conversion troubles.


Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> 
> > On Jul  9, 2018, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 07/09/2018 01:57 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > >> Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>:
> > >>> I'm not aware of any such merges, but any that occurred most likely
> > >>> happened after mid-April when the trunk was re-opened for development.
> > 
> > >> I'm pretty certain things were still good at r256000.  I've started that
> > >> check running.  Not expecting results in less than twelve hours.
> > 
> > > r256000 would be roughly Christmas 2017.
> > 
> > When was the RAID/LVM disk corruption incident?  Could it possibly have
> > left any of our svn repo metadata in a corrupted way that confuses
> > reposurgeon, and that leads to such huge differences?
> 
> That was 14/15 Aug 2017, and all the SVN revision data up to r251080 were 
> restored from backup within 24 hours or so.  I found no signs of damage to 
> revisions from the 24 hours or so between r251080 and the time of the 
> corruption when I examined diffs for all those revisions by hand at that 
> time.

Agreed. I don't think that incident is at the root of the problems.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>

My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]