This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Redundant sign-extension instructions on RISC-V


On 08/30/2017 02:43 AM, Michael Clark wrote:
> POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED -1 (which is true) is defined on some targets. I assume they sign-extend but the meaning has been overloaded.

Just for your edification, this is for e.g. ia64's "addp4" instruction and it
is not a normal extension.  A 2-bit segment tag of a 32-bit pointer is remapped
to a 3-bit segment tag of a 64-bit pointer and also zeros bits {60:32}.

If you care,

  http://refspecs.linuxbase.org/IA64-softdevman-vol3

has a nice picture that better describes this.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]