This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
October 31, 2016
23:05 | Link Question | Peter Hill |
October 30, 2016
22:35 | gcc-7-20161030 is now available | gccadmin |
October 28, 2016
12:00 | [PATCH][0/2] GIMPLE Frontend | Richard Biener |
11:08 | Questions about pedantic_non_lvalue_loc and related code | Bin.Cheng |
08:17 | Re: libffi maintenance within GCC? | Andrew Haley |
03:03 | Re: libffi maintenance within GCC? | Ian Lance Taylor |
October 27, 2016
22:36 | gcc-6-20161027 is now available | gccadmin |
19:17 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Toon Moene |
13:59 | Re: libffi maintenance within GCC? | Andrew Haley |
13:16 | boehm-gc maintenance within GCC ? | Matthias Klose |
13:09 | Re: libffi maintenance within GCC? | Anthony Green |
12:56 | libffi maintenance within GCC? | Matthias Klose |
October 26, 2016
18:31 | Re: History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
18:24 | Re: History of GCC | Eric Gallager |
18:06 | Re: History of GCC | David Edelsohn |
18:04 | Re: History of GCC | Ed Smith-Rowland |
17:56 | Re: History of GCC | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:49 | Re: History of GCC | Ed Smith-Rowland |
17:35 | Re: History of GCC | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
17:33 | Re: History of GCC | Richard Kenner |
17:32 | Re: History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
17:28 | Re: History of GCC | Richard Kenner |
17:26 | Re: History of GCC | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:24 | Re: History of GCC | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:17 | Re: History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
17:16 | Re: History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
17:16 | Re: History of GCC | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:06 | Re: History of GCC | Jakub Jelinek |
16:57 | Re: History of GCC | Marek Polacek |
16:35 | Re: History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
16:31 | Re: History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
15:56 | Re: History of GCC | Jeff Law |
13:20 | Re: History of GCC | Joel Sherrill |
13:07 | Re: History of GCC | Ian Lance Taylor |
09:24 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Richard Biener |
05:53 | History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
October 25, 2016
22:36 | gcc-5-20161025 is now available | gccadmin |
19:42 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Toon Moene |
08:46 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Maxim Ostapenko |
08:37 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Jakub Jelinek |
08:32 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Maxim Ostapenko |
08:16 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Richard Biener |
October 24, 2016
21:25 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Eric Gallager |
20:21 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Toon Moene |
15:09 | Call for Participation: Valgrind at FOSDEM 2017 | Mark Wielaard |
October 23, 2016
22:35 | gcc-7-20161023 is now available | gccadmin |
18:58 | Re: where is the source code generate crtbegin.o (i386)? | Florian Weimer |
17:30 | where is the source code generate crtbegin.o (i386)? | zet |
October 22, 2016
14:34 | Re: Calling convention for "Routines for floating point emulation" | Yichao Yu |
02:44 | Website bị mất đi từ khóa gg... | Truong Tuan |
October 21, 2016
21:05 | Copyright assignment | Dimitar Dimitrov |
19:44 | Re: I see this maybe related to PR71375 ? | David Edelsohn |
19:41 | I see this maybe related to PR71375 ? | Jerry DeLisle |
16:07 | Re: glibc test tst-thread_local1.cc fails to compile with latest GCC | Steve Ellcey |
16:03 | Re: glibc test tst-thread_local1.cc fails to compile with latest GCC | Jonathan Wakely |
13:46 | GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Jakub Jelinek |
10:03 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Florian Weimer |
08:39 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Florian Weimer |
October 20, 2016
22:36 | gcc-6-20161020 is now available | gccadmin |
22:08 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Eric Botcazou |
20:30 | Re: Reduced source set | Jonathan Wakely |
20:06 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Jim Wilson |
19:05 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Florian Weimer |
18:52 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Florian Weimer |
18:37 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Jeff Law |
17:17 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Andreas Schwab |
16:28 | LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Florian Weimer |
15:14 | Reduced source set | Bernhard Schommer |
08:45 | Re: [BUILDROBOT] s390.md:10630:9: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] | Andreas Krebbel1 |
October 19, 2016
17:51 | Re: glibc test tst-thread_local1.cc fails to compile with latest GCC | Andrew Pinski |
17:45 | glibc test tst-thread_local1.cc fails to compile with latest GCC | Ellcey, Steve |
17:15 | Re: [BUILDROBOT] ICE in altivec_init_builtins, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17547 | David Edelsohn |
16:59 | [BUILDROBOT] ICE in altivec_init_builtins, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17547 | Jan-Benedict Glaw |
16:38 | Re: [BUILDROBOT] s390.md:10630:9: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] | Jeff Law |
16:26 | [BUILDROBOT] s390.md:10630:9: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] | Jan-Benedict Glaw |
10:58 | Re: [PR lto/77458] Avoid ICE in offloading with differing _FloatN, _FloatNx types | Thomas Schwinge |
10:29 | [PR tree-optimization/78024] Clear basic block flags before using BB_VISITED for OpenACC loops processing | Thomas Schwinge |
10:07 | Re: Clear basic block flags before using BB_VISITED for OpenACC loops processing | Richard Biener |
October 18, 2016
October 17, 2016
October 16, 2016
23:48 | Re: Question about sibling call epilogues & registers | Daniel Santos |
22:35 | gcc-7-20161016 is now available | gccadmin |
22:27 | Re: Question about sibling call epilogues & registers | Segher Boessenkool |
22:02 | Re: Question about sibling call epilogues & registers | Daniel Santos |
16:27 | [RFC] Reliable compiler specification setting (at least include/lib dirs) through the process environment | Shea Levy |
01:41 | Re: Question about sibling call epilogues & registers | Segher Boessenkool |
October 15, 2016
12:29 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
06:42 | Question about sibling call epilogues & registers | Daniel Santos |
October 14, 2016
15:36 | DWARF Version 5 Public Review Draft Released | Michael Eager |
11:07 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Richard Biener |
11:07 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Richard Biener |
11:00 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Nathan Sidwell |
10:57 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Bernd Schmidt |
09:28 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Richard Biener |
09:27 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Richard Biener |
09:15 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Bernd Schmidt |
08:02 | basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Thomas Schwinge |
October 13, 2016
22:36 | gcc-6-20161013 is now available | gccadmin |
20:21 | Re: bootstrap possibly broken on trunk ? | Martin Sebor |
19:42 | Re: bootstrap possibly broken on trunk ? | Christophe Lyon |
18:31 | Re: bootstrap possibly broken on trunk ? | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
17:42 | bootstrap possibly broken on trunk ? | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
16:45 | small testcase gcc6 + boost optional + Wmaybe-uninit | Jason Mancini |
14:22 | Users of tm_p.h and emit-rtl.h now need to include memmodel.h | Thomas Preudhomme |
10:16 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Eric Botcazou |
08:50 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Richard Biener |
08:46 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Andre Vieira (lists) |
08:34 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Andre Vieira (lists) |
07:52 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Marc Glisse |
07:29 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
October 12, 2016
17:59 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Eric Botcazou |
16:50 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Jakub Jelinek |
16:45 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Jakub Jelinek |
16:02 | Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Andre Vieira (lists) |
16:01 | Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Andre Vieira (lists) |
09:14 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Richard Biener |
09:07 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Marc Glisse |
07:48 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Richard Biener |
07:45 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
07:39 | how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
October 11, 2016
22:36 | gcc-5-20161011 is now available | gccadmin |
21:32 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Jeff Law |
18:48 | Bootstrap breakage in Fortran | Jerry DeLisle |
17:24 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Jason Merrill |
15:54 | RE: VREGS cannot handle subreg(mem (plus ...)) pattern | Claudiu Zissulescu |
15:06 | Re: VREGS cannot handle subreg(mem (plus ...)) pattern | Jeff Law |
14:58 | Re: VREGS cannot handle subreg(mem (plus ...)) pattern | Claudiu Zissulescu |
14:54 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Martin Sebor |
14:49 | VREGS cannot handle subreg(mem (plus ...)) pattern | Claudiu Zissulescu |
01:59 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Eric S. Raymond |
October 10, 2016
22:16 | Re: Converting to LRA (calling all maintainers) | Eric Botcazou |
21:53 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Joseph Myers |
20:08 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Eric S. Raymond |
17:47 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Joseph Myers |
15:43 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Jason Merrill |
10:38 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Jonathan Wakely |
09:38 | Re: error printing in reversed order ? | Jonathan Wakely |
October 09, 2016
22:35 | gcc-7-20161009 is now available | gccadmin |
October 07, 2016
October 06, 2016
22:37 | gcc-6-20161006 is now available | gccadmin |
21:59 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Frank Ch. Eigler |
20:31 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Joseph Myers |
19:41 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Jason Merrill |
17:19 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Eric S. Raymond |
16:10 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Joseph Myers |
16:01 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Eric S. Raymond |
15:43 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Joseph Myers |
12:45 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | David Brown |
October 05, 2016
22:59 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Pedro Alves |
22:56 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Pedro Alves |
20:24 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Florian Weimer |
20:19 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Florian Weimer |
16:23 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Jason Merrill |
16:18 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Paul.Koning |
16:12 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Jeff Law |
06:59 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | David Brown |
00:08 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Martin Sebor |
October 04, 2016
October 03, 2016
23:49 | style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Martin Sebor |
14:09 | Re: [PATCH MIPS] Work around Bash 4.2 bug | Ludovic Courtès |
09:50 | Re: [PATCH MIPS] Work around Bash 4.2 bug | Maciej W. Rozycki |
02:31 | Re: doc maintainer questions | David Wohlferd |
October 02, 2016
22:36 | gcc-7-20161002 is now available | gccadmin |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]