This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
March 31, 2016
March 30, 2016
23:29 | Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? | Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez |
22:36 | gcc-4.9-20160330 is now available | gccadmin |
19:09 | Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c | Bernd Schmidt |
11:24 | Re: (MIPS R5900) Adding support for the FPU (COP1) instructions | Woon yung Liu |
09:58 | RE: (MIPS R5900) Adding support for the FPU (COP1) instructions | Matthew Fortune |
09:26 | (MIPS R5900) Adding support for the FPU (COP1) instructions | Woon yung Liu |
March 29, 2016
23:01 | Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? | Joseph Myers |
22:36 | gcc-5-20160329 is now available | gccadmin |
21:26 | Re: Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? | kevin-tucker |
20:30 | Re: Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? | Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez |
17:01 | Re: regression in C++ parsing performance between 4.9.3 and 5.3.1 | Jonathan Wakely |
15:10 | Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? | Thomas Schwinge |
March 28, 2016
22:32 | Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? | Martin Sebor |
19:56 | Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? | Florian Weimer |
19:55 | Re: Compute all gimple statements in which a var is used | Richard Biener |
18:23 | Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? | kevin-tucker |
17:23 | Compute all gimple statements in which a var is used | Cristina Georgiana Opriceana |
15:10 | Re: Spurious register spill with volatile function argument | Florian Weimer |
14:34 | Re: Spurious register spill with volatile function argument | Paul_Koning |
12:58 | regression in C++ parsing performance between 4.9.3 and 5.3.1 | PÃdraig Brady |
12:12 | Re: Spurious register spill with volatile function argument | Florian Weimer |
09:16 | Re: Spurious register spill with volatile function argument | Andrew Haley |
09:02 | Re: Constexpr in intrinsics? | Marc Glisse |
00:34 | Re: Constexpr in intrinsics? | Allan Sandfeld Jensen |
March 27, 2016
22:36 | gcc-6-20160327 is now available | gccadmin |
13:09 | Re: Re: Implementing TI mode (128-bit) and the 2nd pipeline for the MIPS R5900 | Liu Woon Yung |
10:53 | Re: Constexpr in intrinsics? | Marc Glisse |
10:16 | Constexpr in intrinsics? | Allan Sandfeld Jensen |
05:58 | Spurious register spill with volatile function argument | Michael Clark |
March 25, 2016
10:24 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Prasad Ghangal |
03:43 | Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c | Aldy Hernandez |
03:16 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
March 24, 2016
21:13 | Cross-compiler --sysroot discrepancy with default library and include paths | Bryan Drewery |
19:46 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Prasad Ghangal |
18:04 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Richard Biener |
17:30 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | David Malcolm |
15:02 | Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c | Alexander Monakov |
13:35 | Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c | Bernd Schmidt |
13:31 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Richard Biener |
10:17 | Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c | Aldy Hernandez |
March 23, 2016
23:45 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Prasad Ghangal |
22:36 | gcc-4.9-20160323 is now available | gccadmin |
18:08 | Re: Subtyping support in GCC? | Jason Chagas |
16:34 | Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c | Vladimir Makarov |
15:44 | Re: Subtyping support in GCC? | Marc Glisse |
15:27 | Subtyping support in GCC? | Jason Chagas |
15:26 | Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c | Bernd Schmidt |
13:11 | [GSoC] Further work on addressing mode selection | Erik Varga |
06:32 | out of bounds access in insn-automata.c | Aldy Hernandez |
00:09 | Re: Mysterious decision in combine | Segher Boessenkool |
March 22, 2016
22:36 | gcc-5-20160322 is now available | gccadmin |
16:34 | Re: Mysterious decision in combine | Richard Henderson |
13:53 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Richard Biener |
13:45 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
10:57 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Richard Biener |
10:53 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Richard Biener |
09:29 | Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? | Richard Biener |
06:50 | Re: 4.9 backport request | Richard Biener |
01:07 | 4.9 backport request | NightStrike |
March 21, 2016
23:08 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Prasad Ghangal |
22:21 | Re: [GCC Wiki] Update of "DebugFission" by CaryCoutant | Cary Coutant |
17:20 | Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? | Jeff Law |
17:17 | Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? | David Malcolm |
17:13 | Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? | Jeff Law |
17:10 | Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? | Trevor Saunders |
16:42 | Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? | Jeff Law |
14:52 | Re: Aggressive load in gcc when accessing escaped pointer? | Michael Matz |
13:32 | Re: Mysterious decision in combine | Dominik Vogt |
03:31 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Trevor Saunders |
03:22 | Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? | Trevor Saunders |
March 20, 2016
23:13 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Prasad Ghangal |
22:36 | gcc-6-20160320 is now available | gccadmin |
March 19, 2016
02:32 | Re: Aggressive load in gcc when accessing escaped pointer? | Cy Cheng |
March 18, 2016
19:18 | Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? | Jeff Law |
18:46 | Re: Aggressive load in gcc when accessing escaped pointer? | Richard Biener |
17:24 | Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? | Jakub Jelinek |
17:17 | Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? | Paul_Koning |
16:54 | Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? | Paulo Matos |
14:26 | Re: Aggressive load in gcc when accessing escaped pointer? | Markus Trippelsdorf |
14:09 | Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? | Jakub Jelinek |
14:05 | Aggressive load in gcc when accessing escaped pointer? | Cy Cheng |
14:02 | Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? | Jonathan Wakely |
12:45 | Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? | Paulo Matos |
10:20 | Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc | kugan |
09:23 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Richard Biener |
05:55 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
March 17, 2016
20:22 | Re: Mysterious decision in combine | Richard Henderson |
12:55 | February/March 2016 GNU Toolchain Update | Nick Clifton |
06:35 | Mysterious decision in combine | Dominik Vogt |
March 16, 2016
22:36 | gcc-4.9-20160316 is now available | gccadmin |
12:28 | Re: [GCC Wiki] Update of "DebugFission" by CaryCoutant | Thomas Schwinge |
March 15, 2016
22:36 | gcc-5-20160315 is now available | gccadmin |
16:46 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Michael Matz |
15:22 | Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data | Marcos DÃaz |
15:16 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Richard Biener |
06:18 | Documentation issue: gccint: define_split "not" allowed to create pseudos | Dominik Vogt |
March 14, 2016
March 13, 2016
22:37 | Re: RFC: Support non-standard extension (call via casted function pointer) | Sergei Trofimovich |
22:36 | gcc-6-20160313 is now available | gccadmin |
March 11, 2016
March 10, 2016
March 09, 2016
March 08, 2016
March 07, 2016
19:49 | Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations | Jeff Law |
19:44 | Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations | Richard Sandiford |
16:34 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | David Malcolm |
15:24 | Re: Bootstrapping is currently broken | Andreas Krebbel |
14:41 | Re: Bootstrapping is currently broken | Dominik Vogt |
14:18 | Re: Bootstrapping is currently broken | Richard Biener |
14:12 | Re: Bootstrapping is currently broken | Dominik Vogt |
14:00 | Re: Bootstrapping is currently broken | Richard Biener |
13:12 | Bootstrapping is currently broken | Dominik Vogt |
12:26 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Richard Biener |
10:44 | Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations | Kyrill Tkachov |
10:13 | Re: collaborative tuning of GCC optimization heuristic | Grigori Fursin |
06:27 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Prasad Ghangal |
05:39 | Re: [RFC PR43721] Optimize a/b and a%b to single divmod call | Ramana Radhakrishnan |
March 06, 2016
22:36 | gcc-6-20160306 is now available | gccadmin |
15:43 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Richard Biener |
14:45 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Diego Novillo |
14:06 | Announce: GNU MPFR 3.1.4 is released | Vincent Lefevre |
14:03 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Trevor Saunders |
11:03 | Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project | Prasad Ghangal |
March 05, 2016
19:29 | Re: Implementing TI mode (128-bit) and the 2nd pipeline for the MIPS R5900 | Richard Henderson |
15:16 | Re: collaborative tuning of GCC optimization heuristic | David Edelsohn |
14:13 | collaborative tuning of GCC optimization heuristic | Grigori Fursin |
05:52 | Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations | Jeff Law |
March 04, 2016
March 03, 2016
17:15 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez |
17:09 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Prasad Ghangal |
17:08 | Re: Need suggestion about bug 68425 | Prasad Ghangal |
16:34 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Jose E. Marchesi |
16:25 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez |
16:04 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Jose E. Marchesi |
14:48 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez |
14:33 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez |
14:09 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez |
13:54 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | David Edelsohn |
13:48 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Joel Sherrill |
13:44 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Jonathan Wakely |
13:24 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Phil Muldoon |
13:13 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Pedro Alves |
10:32 | Re: GCC GSOC 2016 | Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez |
March 02, 2016
22:36 | gcc-4.9-20160302 is now available | gccadmin |
18:02 | Re: Security Users List | Ross Nelson |
12:59 | [committed, PATCH][gcc-5-branch] Fix g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array13.C | H.J. Lu |
04:44 | Re: Proposal to deprecate: mep (Toshiba Media Processor) | DJ Delorie |
00:30 | Re: RFC: Update Intel386, x86-64 and IA MCU psABIs for passing/returning empty struct | Jason Merrill |
March 01, 2016
22:37 | gcc-5-20160301 is now available | gccadmin |
21:05 | Re: Importance of transformations that turn data dependencies into control dependencies? | Paul E. McKenney |
16:55 | Re: Importance of transformations that turn data dependencies into control dependencies? | Michael Matz |
16:43 | Re: RFC: Update Intel386, x86-64 and IA MCU psABIs for passing/returning empty struct | Michael Matz |
09:40 | Re: Importance of transformations that turn data dependencies into control dependencies? | Richard Biener |
09:27 | Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data | Richard Biener |
04:35 | Re: Importance of transformations that turn data dependencies into control dependencies? | Torvald Riegel |
03:30 | Re: Importance of transformations that turn data dependencies into control dependencies? | Torvald Riegel |
01:28 | Re: [isocpp-parallel] Proposal for new memory_order_consume definition | Paul E. McKenney |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]