gcc archive
date index for March, 2016

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2016
22:23 Re: stray quotation marks warning enhancement or extension Jonathan Wakely
20:10 stray quotation marks warning enhancement or extension Daniel Gutson
18:04 Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? Segher Boessenkool
16:34 Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? Florian Weimer
16:31 Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? Segher Boessenkool
15:49 Re: How to identify the version of the LLVM AddressSanitizer integrated to GCC 4.9.3 and after Maxim Ostapenko
15:21 Re: How to identify the version of the LLVM AddressSanitizer integrated to GCC 4.9.3 and after Gayan Pathirage
11:32 [ipa-comdat] put symbol in new comdat group if it's referenced from multiple comdat groups Prathamesh Kulkarni
11:10 Re: How to identify the version of the LLVM AddressSanitizer integrated to GCC 4.9.3 and after Maxim Ostapenko
09:53 How to identify the version of the LLVM AddressSanitizer integrated to GCC 4.9.3 and after Gayan Pathirage

March 30, 2016
23:29 Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
22:36 gcc-4.9-20160330 is now available gccadmin
19:09 Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c Bernd Schmidt
11:24 Re: (MIPS R5900) Adding support for the FPU (COP1) instructions Woon yung Liu
09:58 RE: (MIPS R5900) Adding support for the FPU (COP1) instructions Matthew Fortune
09:26 (MIPS R5900) Adding support for the FPU (COP1) instructions Woon yung Liu

March 29, 2016
23:01 Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? Joseph Myers
22:36 gcc-5-20160329 is now available gccadmin
21:26 Re: Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? kevin-tucker
20:30 Re: Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
17:01 Re: regression in C++ parsing performance between 4.9.3 and 5.3.1 Jonathan Wakely
15:10 Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? Thomas Schwinge

March 28, 2016
22:32 Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? Martin Sebor
19:56 Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? Florian Weimer
19:55 Re: Compute all gimple statements in which a var is used Richard Biener
18:23 Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? kevin-tucker
17:23 Compute all gimple statements in which a var is used Cristina Georgiana Opriceana
15:10 Re: Spurious register spill with volatile function argument Florian Weimer
14:34 Re: Spurious register spill with volatile function argument Paul_Koning
12:58 regression in C++ parsing performance between 4.9.3 and 5.3.1 PÃdraig Brady
12:12 Re: Spurious register spill with volatile function argument Florian Weimer
09:16 Re: Spurious register spill with volatile function argument Andrew Haley
09:02 Re: Constexpr in intrinsics? Marc Glisse
00:34 Re: Constexpr in intrinsics? Allan Sandfeld Jensen

March 27, 2016
22:36 gcc-6-20160327 is now available gccadmin
13:09 Re: Re: Implementing TI mode (128-bit) and the 2nd pipeline for the MIPS R5900 Liu Woon Yung
10:53 Re: Constexpr in intrinsics? Marc Glisse
10:16 Constexpr in intrinsics? Allan Sandfeld Jensen
05:58 Spurious register spill with volatile function argument Michael Clark

March 25, 2016
10:24 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Prasad Ghangal
03:43 Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c Aldy Hernandez
03:16 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Prathamesh Kulkarni

March 24, 2016
21:13 Cross-compiler --sysroot discrepancy with default library and include paths Bryan Drewery
19:46 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Prasad Ghangal
18:04 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
17:30 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project David Malcolm
15:02 Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c Alexander Monakov
13:35 Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c Bernd Schmidt
13:31 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
10:17 Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c Aldy Hernandez

March 23, 2016
23:45 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Prasad Ghangal
22:36 gcc-4.9-20160323 is now available gccadmin
18:08 Re: Subtyping support in GCC? Jason Chagas
16:34 Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c Vladimir Makarov
15:44 Re: Subtyping support in GCC? Marc Glisse
15:27 Subtyping support in GCC? Jason Chagas
15:26 Re: out of bounds access in insn-automata.c Bernd Schmidt
13:11 [GSoC] Further work on addressing mode selection Erik Varga
06:32 out of bounds access in insn-automata.c Aldy Hernandez
00:09 Re: Mysterious decision in combine Segher Boessenkool

March 22, 2016
22:36 gcc-5-20160322 is now available gccadmin
16:34 Re: Mysterious decision in combine Richard Henderson
13:53 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
13:45 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Prathamesh Kulkarni
10:57 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
10:53 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
09:29 Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? Richard Biener
06:50 Re: 4.9 backport request Richard Biener
01:07 4.9 backport request NightStrike

March 21, 2016
23:08 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Prasad Ghangal
22:21 Re: [GCC Wiki] Update of "DebugFission" by CaryCoutant Cary Coutant
17:20 Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? Jeff Law
17:17 Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? David Malcolm
17:13 Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? Jeff Law
17:10 Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? Trevor Saunders
16:42 Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? Jeff Law
14:52 Re: Aggressive load in gcc when accessing escaped pointer? Michael Matz
13:32 Re: Mysterious decision in combine Dominik Vogt
03:31 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Trevor Saunders
03:22 Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? Trevor Saunders

March 20, 2016
23:13 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Prasad Ghangal
22:36 gcc-6-20160320 is now available gccadmin

March 19, 2016
02:32 Re: Aggressive load in gcc when accessing escaped pointer? Cy Cheng

March 18, 2016
19:18 Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? Jeff Law
18:46 Re: Aggressive load in gcc when accessing escaped pointer? Richard Biener
17:24 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Jakub Jelinek
17:17 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Paul_Koning
16:54 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Paulo Matos
14:26 Re: Aggressive load in gcc when accessing escaped pointer? Markus Trippelsdorf
14:09 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Jakub Jelinek
14:05 Aggressive load in gcc when accessing escaped pointer? Cy Cheng
14:02 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Jonathan Wakely
12:45 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Paulo Matos
10:20 Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc kugan
09:23 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
05:55 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Prathamesh Kulkarni

March 17, 2016
20:22 Re: Mysterious decision in combine Richard Henderson
12:55 February/March 2016 GNU Toolchain Update Nick Clifton
06:35 Mysterious decision in combine Dominik Vogt

March 16, 2016
22:36 gcc-4.9-20160316 is now available gccadmin
12:28 Re: [GCC Wiki] Update of "DebugFission" by CaryCoutant Thomas Schwinge

March 15, 2016
22:36 gcc-5-20160315 is now available gccadmin
16:46 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Michael Matz
15:22 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Marcos DÃaz
15:16 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
06:18 Documentation issue: gccint: define_split "not" allowed to create pseudos Dominik Vogt

March 14, 2016
18:28 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Michael Matz
18:03 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Richard Biener
16:51 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Paul_Koning
16:26 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? David Malcolm
16:25 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Andrey Tarasevich
16:05 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? C BergstrÃm
15:53 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Ewart TimothÃe
15:52 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Andrey Tarasevich
15:51 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Andrey Tarasevich
15:42 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Paul_Koning
15:40 Re: Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? C BergstrÃm
15:32 Is test case with 700k lines of code a valid test case? Andrey Tarasevich
14:16 Re: [PATCH] Free dominance info if any edges are eliminated Richard Biener

March 13, 2016
22:37 Re: RFC: Support non-standard extension (call via casted function pointer) Sergei Trofimovich
22:36 gcc-6-20160313 is now available gccadmin

March 11, 2016
18:18 PowerPC A2 QPX vector instruction support William Scullin
17:47 Re: [PATCH] Free dominance info if any edges are eliminated H.J. Lu
17:21 C++17 is_always_lock_free implementation JF Bastien
15:24 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Kyrill Tkachov
14:45 [PATCH] Free dominance info if any edges are eliminated H.J. Lu
14:03 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? Richard Biener
14:01 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
13:50 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
13:19 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? Richard Biener
13:02 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
12:58 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? Richard Biener
12:47 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
10:06 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? Richard Biener
03:10 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
03:03 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? Jeff Law
03:00 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu

March 10, 2016
23:32 Re: bug report : gfortran E edit descriptor sudo.michio
21:30 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
21:24 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? Jeff Law
20:25 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
20:22 [PATCH] Hack to make gimple dump parseable as C (was Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project) David Malcolm
20:18 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? Richard Biener
17:03 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
14:57 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
13:49 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? Jakub Jelinek
13:49 RE: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? Enkovich, Ilya
13:43 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
13:41 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
13:24 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? Richard Biener
13:16 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
13:01 Re: Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? Richard Biener
12:48 Shouldn't convert_scalars_to_vector call free_dominance_info? H.J. Lu
12:36 GCC 6 Status Report (2016-03-10) Richard Biener
12:05 [OT] "open standards" in gcc feedback C BergstrÃm
10:50 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
10:46 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
10:14 Re: bug report : gfortran E edit descriptor Tobias Burnus
10:09 Re: bug report : gfortran E edit descriptor Dominique d'HumiÃres
09:43 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Prasad Ghangal
08:40 bug report : gfortran E edit descriptor sudo.michio

March 09, 2016
23:57 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Trevor Saunders
22:36 gcc-4.9-20160309 is now available gccadmin
20:26 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Eric Botcazou
19:58 Re: Nios2 arch=r1/r2 Sandra Loosemore
19:47 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
17:09 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Segher Boessenkool
16:56 Re: Implementing TI mode (128-bit) and the 2nd pipeline for the MIPS R5900 Richard Henderson
16:40 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Andrew MacLeod
16:36 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
16:07 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Diego Novillo
15:47 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
14:27 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Andrew MacLeod
14:23 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Andres Tiraboschi
13:45 Re: Implementing TI mode (128-bit) and the 2nd pipeline for the MIPS R5900 Woon yung Liu
10:03 Nios2 arch=r1/r2 BELBACHIR Selim
02:46 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Trevor Saunders
01:05 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Jeff Law

March 08, 2016
22:36 gcc-5-20160308 is now available gccadmin
22:13 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Diego Novillo
22:00 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project David Malcolm
21:37 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
21:01 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
20:54 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Trevor Saunders
19:11 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Jeff Law
18:49 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Richard Henderson
17:44 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Mikhail Maltsev
16:48 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project David Malcolm
15:56 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
15:43 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
15:02 Re: RFC: Update Intel386, x86-64 and IA MCU psABIs for passing/returning empty struct H.J. Lu
11:02 Re: Bootstrapping is currently broken Dominik Vogt
00:20 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Trevor Saunders

March 07, 2016
19:49 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Jeff Law
19:44 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Richard Sandiford
16:34 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project David Malcolm
15:24 Re: Bootstrapping is currently broken Andreas Krebbel
14:41 Re: Bootstrapping is currently broken Dominik Vogt
14:18 Re: Bootstrapping is currently broken Richard Biener
14:12 Re: Bootstrapping is currently broken Dominik Vogt
14:00 Re: Bootstrapping is currently broken Richard Biener
13:12 Bootstrapping is currently broken Dominik Vogt
12:26 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
10:44 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Kyrill Tkachov
10:13 Re: collaborative tuning of GCC optimization heuristic Grigori Fursin
06:27 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Prasad Ghangal
05:39 Re: [RFC PR43721] Optimize a/b and a%b to single divmod call Ramana Radhakrishnan

March 06, 2016
22:36 gcc-6-20160306 is now available gccadmin
15:43 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Richard Biener
14:45 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Diego Novillo
14:06 Announce: GNU MPFR 3.1.4 is released Vincent Lefevre
14:03 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Trevor Saunders
11:03 Re: [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Prasad Ghangal

March 05, 2016
19:29 Re: Implementing TI mode (128-bit) and the 2nd pipeline for the MIPS R5900 Richard Henderson
15:16 Re: collaborative tuning of GCC optimization heuristic David Edelsohn
14:13 collaborative tuning of GCC optimization heuristic Grigori Fursin
05:52 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Jeff Law

March 04, 2016
23:30 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
21:31 [gimplefe] [gsoc16] Gimple Front End Project Prasad Ghangal
20:10 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Prathamesh Kulkarni
19:59 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
19:51 Re: Need suggestion about bug 68425 Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
19:36 Re: Need suggestion about bug 68425 David Malcolm
16:33 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Kyrill Tkachov
16:22 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Jeff Law
15:30 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Kyrill Tkachov
15:12 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Kyrill Tkachov
15:07 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Segher Boessenkool
15:05 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Richard Biener
14:48 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Kyrill Tkachov
14:41 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Kyrill Tkachov
12:23 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Segher Boessenkool
12:00 Re: Validity of SUBREG+AND-imm transformations Segher Boessenkool

March 03, 2016
17:15 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
17:09 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Prasad Ghangal
17:08 Re: Need suggestion about bug 68425 Prasad Ghangal
16:34 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Jose E. Marchesi
16:25 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
16:04 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Jose E. Marchesi
14:48 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
14:33 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
14:09 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
13:54 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 David Edelsohn
13:48 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Joel Sherrill
13:44 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Jonathan Wakely
13:24 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Phil Muldoon
13:13 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Pedro Alves
10:32 Re: GCC GSOC 2016 Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez

March 02, 2016
22:36 gcc-4.9-20160302 is now available gccadmin
18:02 Re: Security Users List Ross Nelson
12:59 [committed, PATCH][gcc-5-branch] Fix g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array13.C H.J. Lu
04:44 Re: Proposal to deprecate: mep (Toshiba Media Processor) DJ Delorie
00:30 Re: RFC: Update Intel386, x86-64 and IA MCU psABIs for passing/returning empty struct Jason Merrill

March 01, 2016
22:37 gcc-5-20160301 is now available gccadmin
21:05 Re: Importance of transformations that turn data dependencies into control dependencies? Paul E. McKenney
16:55 Re: Importance of transformations that turn data dependencies into control dependencies? Michael Matz
16:43 Re: RFC: Update Intel386, x86-64 and IA MCU psABIs for passing/returning empty struct Michael Matz
09:40 Re: Importance of transformations that turn data dependencies into control dependencies? Richard Biener
09:27 Re: Compiler support for erasure of sensitive data Richard Biener
04:35 Re: Importance of transformations that turn data dependencies into control dependencies? Torvald Riegel
03:30 Re: Importance of transformations that turn data dependencies into control dependencies? Torvald Riegel
01:28 Re: [isocpp-parallel] Proposal for new memory_order_consume definition Paul E. McKenney


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc